Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Flock Safety Revises Data Policies Amid Privacy Lawsuits and Contract Losses

A surveillance technology company's policy shift in response to legal and public pressure raises questions about how law enforcement data retention standards are set and by whom.

The Congressional Times · August 16, 2026

Flock Safety, a private company that operates a national network of AI-powered license plate readers used by law enforcement agencies, announced changes to its privacy and data retention policies on Thursday, August 14, 2026, according to reporting by The Hill. The announcement followed a wave of terminated municipal contracts and active privacy litigation against the company.

The Hill reported that Flock is facing lawsuits from communities and civil liberties organizations concerned about mass surveillance and potential misuse of the technology by law enforcement. The specific number of active lawsuits and the jurisdictions in which contracts have been terminated were not fully enumerated in the available source material. Court dockets in relevant jurisdictions would identify pending litigation by case name and filing date.

Flock's license plate reader network allows law enforcement to log and query vehicle movement data. Critics, including groups associated with civil liberties advocacy, have raised concerns that the technology enables surveillance beyond the scope of individual investigations. The company has not disclosed what specific data retention timelines governed its system prior to the Thursday announcement, nor has it published the full text of the updated policy in a location cited by available sources.

The Florida governor's race and the August congressional recess are also drawing political attention this week, according to The Hill, but neither development intersects directly with the Flock policy changes. No federal legislation specifically governing private license plate reader networks has been enacted as of the publication date of this article. A search of Congress.gov for bills addressing commercial AI surveillance infrastructure would reveal whether any relevant measure has advanced through committee in the current session.

What remains unknown is the precise language of Flock's revised data retention policy, the total number of government contracts terminated, and the case names and statuses of pending privacy lawsuits. Those details would be found in Flock's published policy documents, municipal contract records subject to public records requests, and court dockets in the jurisdictions where suits have been filed.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com