Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

DOJ Finalizes Rule Creating Firearm Rights Restoration Path for Felons

The new regulation establishes a formal administrative process for certain convicted felons to petition for reinstatement of gun ownership rights, a policy shift with measurable implications for...

The Congressional Times · August 17, 2026

The U.S. Department of Justice finalized a rule on August 11, 2026, that creates a petition process allowing individuals previously barred from firearm ownership due to criminal convictions to apply for restoration of those rights, according to reporting by the New York Post citing the DOJ announcement. The rule was advanced under Attorney General Todd Blanche, who was confirmed to lead the department earlier this year. The DOJ has not yet published the full regulatory text in a publicly accessible Federal Register notice as of the publication date of this article. That document would specify eligibility criteria, disqualifying offenses, and the administering agency.

The rule is framed by DOJ officials as a Second Amendment restoration measure, specifically targeting individuals with nonviolent felony convictions. Federal law under 18 U.S.C. Section 922(g)(1) prohibits any person convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year from possessing firearms. A restoration pathway would require applicants to demonstrate they no longer pose a public safety risk, though the specific legal standard to be applied has not been confirmed in publicly available documents as of this writing.

Second Amendment advocacy organizations have sought a federal restoration mechanism for decades. Congress eliminated funding for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to process such applications in annual appropriations legislation beginning in 1992, effectively shutting down the existing statutory pathway under 18 U.S.C. Section 925(c). The new DOJ rule appears to create an administrative alternative, though whether it circumvents the funding restriction or operates through a separate authority is not confirmed in available public records. The Federal Register filing would clarify the statutory basis.

The rule will face legal scrutiny from both gun control advocacy groups, who argue expanded access increases public safety risks, and potential constitutional challenges from petitioners denied relief. No litigation has been filed as of the publication date of this article. The DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel opinion supporting the rule's authority, if one exists, has not been made public. A Freedom of Information Act request to DOJ would be the appropriate mechanism to obtain that analysis.

Several material facts remain unknown. The number of individuals estimated to be eligible under the new rule has not been disclosed by DOJ. The agency responsible for adjudicating petitions, the timeline for processing applications, and the appeals process for denied petitioners are not confirmed in available public sources. The complete text of the finalized rule, once published in the Federal Register, will answer those questions and establish the effective date of the new process.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com