Legal Intelligence

ACLU Petitions Supreme Court to Review Texas Ten Commandments School Law

The petition places Senate Bill 10 before the Court at a moment when First Amendment Establishment Clause jurisprudence remains unsettled following recent rulings on government-sponsored religious...

The Congressional Times · August 17, 2026

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking the justices to review Texas Senate Bill 10, a 2025 state law requiring public schools to display a government-selected version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom from kindergarten through grade 12, according to a report published August 17, 2026 by the Washington Examiner. The ACLU argues in its petition that the mandate violates the First Amendment rights of students and parents under the Establishment Clause.

Texas Senate Bill 10 was enacted in 2025 and mandates that the display be permanent and conspicuous. The law specifies a state-selected version of the text, meaning individual school districts do not have discretion over the specific wording used. The ACLU petition consolidates two separate legal challenges to the law, according to the Washington Examiner report.

The Supreme Court's willingness to take up the case is not yet determined. The Court accepts a small fraction of petitions submitted each term. If the justices grant certiorari, the case would be argued during the Court's next available term. The docket number for the ACLU petition was not available in the source material reviewed for this report; that number would appear in the Supreme Court's public docket at supremecourt.gov and would confirm the precise filing date and consolidation status.

The legal context is relevant. In Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022), the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of a public school football coach who prayed on the field after games, applying a history-and-tradition test rather than the prior Lemon test for Establishment Clause cases. How that framework applies to mandatory, government-authored religious displays in public school classrooms is a question the Court has not directly addressed since that decision.

What remains unknown: whether the Supreme Court will grant certiorari, the specific docket number of the ACLU petition, and the full text of the two lower-court rulings being challenged. The lower-court records and opinions would be available through the federal court PACER system and would detail the legal reasoning that each district or appellate court applied to the two consolidated challenges.

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com