Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
National Security

DNI Gabbard Rescinds Two Biden-Era Intelligence Assessments on Havana Syndrome

The formal withdrawal of IC assessments finding no foreign adversary link reopens a classified evidentiary dispute that has persisted since 2021 — and shifts the institutional burden of proof back...

The Congressional Times · June 12, 2026

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard rescinded two Intelligence Community Assessments on Havana Syndrome on June 12, 2026, formally withdrawing Biden-era findings that had concluded a foreign adversary attack was an unlikely cause of the reported neurological symptoms experienced by U.S. government personnel abroad, according to reporting by the New York Post citing the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The rescinded assessments, produced under the prior administration, had been relied upon by multiple federal agencies to categorize Havana Syndrome — also referred to in official records as Anomalous Health Incidents, or AHI — as unlikely the result of deliberate foreign targeting. Gabbard's office stated the assessments selectively excluded evidence, mischaracterized sources to suppress alternative analyses, omitted information related to source quality, and relied on what it described as an "ethically flawed medical study," according to the New York Post report dated June 12, 2026.

A word from our sponsor: Have you thought about life insurance or annuities but didn't want the sales pressure? PolicyPrepper.com is a free, no-pressure educational platform with a built-in AI that answers all your questions — no agent calls, no obligation. Check it out at PolicyPrepper.com.

Havana Syndrome was first reported by U.S. Embassy personnel in Havana, Cuba beginning in 2016. Subsequent incidents were reported by U.S. personnel in China, Russia, and elsewhere. Congress passed the Helping American Victims Afflicted by Neurological Attacks (HAVANA) Act in 2021, signed into law by President Biden, which authorized compensation payments to affected personnel. The CIA, State Department, and other agencies have at various points issued differing internal assessments of probable cause, none of which have been fully declassified as of this publication date.

The ODNI did not, as of the time of this report, release replacement assessments or name a specific foreign actor as responsible. The rescission order itself — including its classification level and the specific ICA document numbers being withdrawn — had not been published in full in the public record as of June 12, 2026.

What remains unknown: whether ODNI will commission new assessments to replace the rescinded documents, which specific intelligence was characterized as excluded or mischaracterized, and whether any findings will be shared with the congressional intelligence committees under their oversight jurisdiction. The full text of the rescission order, if issued in unclassified form, would be the primary public record to consult. Affected personnel who received or applied for HAVANA Act compensation payments may also seek clarification from the CIA Office of Medical Services and relevant agency inspectors general on whether the policy change affects their claims.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com