Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Politics

Blanche Meets Grassley as AG Confirmation Hearing Approaches

With Democrats broadly opposed and the Senate Judiciary Committee controlling the timeline, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's path to confirmation depends heavily on how Republican committee...

The Congressional Times · June 16, 2026

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on Monday, June 16, 2026, as Blanche prepares for a confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which Grassley chairs, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. Blanche has been serving in an acting capacity following the resignation of former Attorney General Pam Bondi, and President Donald Trump formally nominated him to the position following that departure.

Grassley's role is procedurally significant: as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he controls whether and when a nominee's confirmation hearing is scheduled and whether the committee advances a nomination to the full Senate floor. The meeting between Blanche and Grassley on Monday is a standard pre-confirmation courtesy call, a common practice documented in Senate precedent for nominees facing committee review.

According to the Washington Examiner report, nearly all Senate Democrats are expected to vote against Blanche's confirmation, which means the margin for error among Republican senators is narrow. The current Senate composition — 53 Republicans, 47 Democrats and independents caucusing with Democrats, per the Senate's official roster as of June 2026 — means Republicans can afford to lose no more than three votes and still confirm Blanche with Vice President JD Vance casting a tie-breaking vote, assuming all Democrats vote no.

Blanche previously served as a defense attorney and represented Donald Trump in federal criminal proceedings, a background that has drawn scrutiny from Democratic senators. The specific lines of questioning senators plan to pursue at the hearing have not been publicly disclosed. No hearing date has been formally announced by the Senate Judiciary Committee as of the publication of this article.

What remains unknown includes the precise vote commitments of individual Republican senators, whether any Democrats may break from expected opposition, and the specific date the committee intends to schedule the confirmation hearing. The Senate Judiciary Committee's official calendar and any public statements from individual senators would be the primary public records to consult for those answers.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com