Campaign Finance

Chakrabarti Spends $8.85 Million, Wins One Precinct in San Francisco Congressional Race

When self-financing reaches the level of $211 per vote with a single-precinct result, the episode offers a data point on the diminishing returns of large personal expenditures in contested urban...

The Congressional Times · June 20, 2026

Saikat Chakrabarti, a former chief of staff to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), spent approximately $8.85 million of personal funds in his bid for the California congressional seat vacated by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, according to campaign finance data analyzed by the San Francisco outlet Mission Local. The expenditure produced 42,049 votes across the primary field, a per-vote cost of roughly $211.30, and Chakrabarti did not advance to the general election. He carried one precinct.

Chakrabarti's filing with the Federal Election Commission would contain the itemized disbursements underlying Mission Local's analysis. The race for California's 11th Congressional District drew multiple candidates following Pelosi's retirement announcement; the FEC's public records portal lists candidate committees for that contest, and the final certified vote totals are maintained by the San Francisco Department of Elections.

The $8.85 million figure, if confirmed by FEC records, would rank among the larger self-financed primary expenditures in a California House race in recent cycles. For comparison, the FEC's public database allows direct comparison across self-financed candidates regardless of party; no equivalent cross-party comparison for this specific primary cycle was available at publication time.

What remains unknown is the complete breakdown of how the funds were allocated — specifically, what share went to paid media, staff, direct mail, and digital advertising. Those line items would appear in the candidate's FEC Form 3 disbursement schedules, which are publicly searchable at fec.gov. The identity of the general election finalists and their respective fundraising totals from all sources would also be found in the same FEC database.

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com