Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Supreme Court Declines Trump Appeal of $5 Million Carroll Verdict

The denial exhausts Trump's federal appellate options on the 2023 jury finding, leaving the $5 million judgment intact unless pursued through other legal avenues.

The Congressional Times · June 29, 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear President Donald Trump's appeal of a $5 million civil jury verdict in the defamation and sexual abuse liability case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll, according to reports from ABC News, Axios, and The Guardian dated June 29, 2026. The Court's denial was issued without a written opinion, which is standard procedure when justices decline to take up a case, and it leaves the lower court ruling in place.

A federal jury in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in the mid-1990s and for defaming her through public statements he made denying her account. The jury awarded Carroll $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages, a figure reported by ABC News and Axios. Trump has consistently denied the allegations and characterized Carroll's accusations as politically motivated, a position his legal team reiterated in the appeal before the Court.

Trump's legal team had argued, according to The Guardian, that the trial was conducted unfairly because the presiding judge permitted jurors to hear evidence of alleged past sexual misconduct by Trump beyond the specific Carroll incident. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit previously rejected that argument and upheld the jury verdict before Trump's team escalated the case to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court's order list reflecting the denial is a public document available on the Court's official docket. The specific vote count among justices is not disclosed in a standard cert denial order; no dissents from the denial have been reported as of this publication.

What remains unknown is whether Trump's legal team intends to pursue any further legal avenues, such as a petition for rehearing, though such petitions are rarely granted. The full accounting of any interest accrued on the $5 million judgment since its entry in 2023 would be determinable through the Southern District of New York court docket, case number 22-cv-10016. The status of any separate Carroll cases against Trump, including a second defamation verdict of approximately $83.3 million issued in January 2024 which is under its own appellate review, is not addressed by Monday's Supreme Court order.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com