Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Smith Obtained Texts From 44 Lawmakers in Trump Prosecution, Grassley Discloses

The disclosure raises unresolved questions about the scope of executive branch access to congressional communications and the Speech or Debate Clause's practical limits.

The Congressional Times · July 18, 2026

Special Counsel Jack Smith obtained text messages to and from 44 members of Congress — including members of both parties — as part of his prosecution of former President Donald Trump, according to a public statement by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), as reported by the New York Post on July 18, 2026. The National Archives transferred the messages to Smith's office in August 2023, according to Grassley's account. Grassley characterized Smith's conduct as having "ran roughshod over the Constitution," language he used in publicly released remarks. The senator is 92 years old and has served in the Senate since 1981, according to the Senate biographical directory.

The constitutional question at the center of Grassley's objection involves the Speech or Debate Clause, found in Article I, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that senators and representatives "shall not be questioned in any other Place" for "any Speech or Debate in either House." Courts have interpreted this clause to provide broad immunity to legislative communications in some circumstances, though its precise application to executive subpoenas of third-party record-holders — such as the National Archives — has not been definitively resolved by the Supreme Court.

It is not publicly known which specific 44 lawmakers received or sent the texts in question, what the content of those communications was, or whether Smith's office sought or received any judicial authorization specific to legislative communications before the Archives transfer occurred. The underlying legal filings from Smith's prosecution, including any subpoenas directed at the National Archives, would be the primary public record that could answer those questions. Some of those filings may remain under seal.

Smith's prosecution of Trump on federal charges related to the events of January 6, 2021, and the handling of classified documents was ultimately dismissed after Trump won the 2024 presidential election, with the Department of Justice citing longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Smith subsequently published a final report on his investigations. Whether any congressional inquiry into the Archives disclosure or the text message acquisition is ongoing is not confirmed in available public records as of today's date. A formal congressional investigation, inspector general referral, or court proceeding would be the mechanisms most likely to produce additional documented findings.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com