Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

California Gas Prices Rise as Refinery Capacity and Reserve Constraints Limit Relief Options

With U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve stocks drawn down significantly from 2022 highs and domestic refinery utilization near operational ceilings, federal and state policy levers to offset further...

The Congressional Times · July 25, 2026

California motorists are paying the highest retail gasoline prices in the contiguous United States, and energy analysts cited in reporting by the New York Post (July 2026) warn that the structural conditions underlying this surge differ from prior episodes. Specifically, analysts point to three converging factors: global supply pressure from ongoing geopolitical conflicts, U.S. refinery utilization running near full operational capacity, and a Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) that has not been fully replenished following record drawdowns authorized by the Biden administration in 2022.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), in its most recent Weekly Petroleum Status Report, confirmed that domestic refinery operable capacity utilization has remained above 90 percent in recent reporting weeks, leaving limited throughput headroom to compensate for any additional supply disruption. The EIA publishes this data weekly at eia.gov and the figures are a matter of public record.

The SPR, which the Biden administration drew down by approximately 180 million barrels between 2021 and 2023 — the largest release in the reserve's history, according to Department of Energy records — stood at approximately 395 million barrels as of mid-2025 DOE inventory reports, well below its pre-drawdown level of roughly 592 million barrels recorded in 2020. The current Trump administration has not announced a congressionally authorized replenishment plan beyond routine purchase orders, and the precise current inventory level would be confirmed by the DOE's Office of Petroleum Reserves weekly report.

At the federal policy level, Congress has authority under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. § 6201 et seq.) to direct SPR releases or authorize emergency fuel measures. No such legislation has been introduced in the current 119th Congress session as of July 25, 2026, according to the congressional legislative record available through Congress.gov. California's own fuel price regulatory environment — including its cap-and-trade program administered by the California Air Resources Board and its state-specific fuel blend requirements — adds a cost layer that federal relief measures cannot directly offset without state legislative action.

The intersection of federal reserve policy, refinery capacity constraints, and California-specific regulatory costs creates a policy environment in which neither federal executive action nor congressional intervention offers a straightforward short-term remedy available to prior administrations. What remains unknown is the precise current SPR inventory as of this week, which would be disclosed in the DOE's next weekly underground storage report, and whether any member of Congress has filed legislation in response to current price levels — information that would appear on Congress.gov under bill search for the 119th Congress.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com