Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

FBI Arrests Three Alleged ISIS Suspects in Plot Targeting US Special Forces

The indictment tests the reach of domestic terrorism statutes against alleged homegrown radicalization, with federal prosecutors relying heavily on undercover investigative methods that courts...

The Congressional Times · June 7, 2026

Federal prosecutors charged three men — Bereen Dzayee, 25, of Lakeside, California; Elias Shamsaldeen, 21, of Porterville, California; and Bisaam Ghafoor, 21, of Leawood, Kansas — on Friday with conspiracy to provide material support to ISIS and participation in a plot to attack United States Special Forces personnel, according to a Department of Justice announcement dated June 6, 2026. Dzayee is an active-duty U.S. Navy sailor stationed near San Diego. The charges follow a lengthy investigation led by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force.

According to the federal criminal complaint, prosecutors allege the three defendants sought to acquire drones, grenades, and rocket-propelled grenades for use in an attack against U.S. military Special Forces operatives. Prosecutors further allege the defendants coordinated plans to funnel financial support to ISIS. The complaint, filed in the relevant U.S. District Court, is the primary public record detailing the specific overt acts alleged. The complaint has not yet been independently verified in full by The Congressional Times.

Dzayee's status as an active-duty Navy sailor raises questions within the jurisdiction of the Senate and House Armed Services Committees regarding insider threat screening protocols, though neither committee has issued a public statement as of publication. The Defense Department has not issued a public comment on Dzayee's security clearance status or the duration of his service, information that would be reflected in official Pentagon personnel records.

All three defendants are presumed innocent under U.S. law unless convicted at trial or upon a guilty plea. Defense attorneys for the defendants, if appointed or retained, had not made public statements available in court dockets reviewed as of the time of publication. The specific federal district in which charges were filed — and therefore which judges will preside — was not confirmed in available public records at time of publication; the DOJ press release would constitute the authoritative source for that detail.

What remains unknown includes the full scope of the alleged network, whether additional defendants may be charged, and what specific undercover or confidential informant methods were used during the investigation. The affidavit supporting the criminal complaint, once fully unsealed and available via PACER, would answer those questions. The Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism has jurisdiction to conduct oversight hearings on domestic ISIS prosecution trends, though no hearing has been scheduled as of June 7, 2026.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com