Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
US Elections

UC Irvine Poll Shows Hilton at 47%, Becerra at 44% in Orange County

A single county poll does not determine a statewide race, but Orange County's historical shift away from Republicans makes Hilton's lead there a data point strategists in both parties will monitor...

The Congressional Times · August 1, 2026

Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton holds a 3-percentage-point lead over Democratic candidate Xavier Becerra among Orange County voters, according to a poll conducted June 9–12, 2026, by the University of California, Irvine. The survey showed Hilton receiving 47% of the Orange County vote share against Becerra's 44%, per reporting by the New York Post citing the UC Irvine poll directly.

Orange County, California's third-most-populous county with approximately 3.2 million residents according to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2020 decennial data, was long a Republican stronghold before shifting toward Democrats in the 2016 and 2018 election cycles. In the 2020 presidential election, Joe Biden carried Orange County over Donald Trump by approximately 7 percentage points, according to certified California Secretary of State results.

Hilton, a former Fox News host, filed as a Republican candidate for California governor. Becerra, who served as California Attorney General before being confirmed as U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services in 2021 — a confirmation recorded in the U.S. Senate's official roll call — subsequently left that federal post and entered the California gubernatorial race as a Democrat.

The UC Irvine poll's full methodology, including margin of error, sample size, and weighting procedures, had not been independently published in full as of this article's publication date. Those details, if released by UC Irvine's social science survey center, would allow readers to assess the poll's statistical confidence interval and whether the 3-point gap falls within or outside the margin of error. California's June 2026 primary results, certified by the California Secretary of State, will provide the next definitive electoral data point for this race.

What remains unknown: statewide polling averages for the Hilton-Becerra contest, each candidate's current fundraising totals as disclosed in California Fair Political Practices Commission filings, and whether any independent candidates have qualified for the ballot. California FPPC disclosure records and the Secretary of State's candidate filing database would answer those questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com