Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Sam Bankman-Fried Submits Formal Pardon Request to Trump Justice Department

A clemency petition from a high-profile federal inmate tests the administration's stated law-and-order posture and raises questions about the pardon process's transparency under existing DOJ...

The Congressional Times · June 8, 2026

Incarcerated FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried has formally submitted a pardon request to President Donald J. Trump, according to a report citing the U.S. Department of Justice clemency process, as reported by the Daily Caller on or before June 8, 2026. Bankman-Fried, 32, is currently serving a 25-year federal prison sentence imposed in March 2024 by U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in the Southern District of New York following his conviction on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy related to the collapse of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange (U.S. v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-00673, S.D.N.Y.).

The formal pardon petition would be processed through the Office of the Pardon Attorney, a component of the U.S. Department of Justice. Under 28 C.F.R. § 1.1–1.10, federal pardon regulations require that a petitioner ordinarily wait five years after release from confinement before applying, though the President retains constitutional authority under Article II, Section 2 to grant clemency at any time regardless of DOJ processing guidelines. Whether Bankman-Fried's petition was submitted directly to the White House or routed through the Office of the Pardon Attorney is not confirmed in available public records as of June 8, 2026.

A word from our sponsor: Have you thought about life insurance or annuities but didn't want the sales pressure? PolicyPrepper.com is a free, no-pressure educational platform with a built-in AI that answers all your questions — no agent calls, no obligation. Check it out at PolicyPrepper.com.

Bankman-Fried was a prominent political donor prior to his arrest. Federal Election Commission records show he contributed approximately $5.2 million to Democratic Party-aligned candidates and committees during the 2021–2022 election cycle and disclosed donations to Republican-affiliated entities as well, though the full scope of his giving across both parties remains subject to ongoing FEC review. His former colleagues at FTX and Alameda Research also made significant contributions to candidates of both parties during that cycle, according to FEC filings.

The Trump administration has not issued a public statement confirming or denying receipt of the petition as of the publication of this article. The White House Office of Communications did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication. Under 28 C.F.R. § 1.6, the Office of the Pardon Attorney is required to investigate each petition and provide a recommendation to the Deputy Attorney General, who then advises the President. No timeline is mandated by regulation for that review.

What remains unknown is whether the Trump White House has accepted the petition for active consideration, which Office of the Pardon Attorney official has been assigned to review it, and whether any communications between Bankman-Fried's legal representatives and administration officials have occurred outside the formal DOJ process. The document that would answer those questions is a White House Counsel or DOJ Office of the Pardon Attorney acknowledgment letter, which is not a public record under current federal disclosure rules absent a court proceeding or congressional subpoena.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com