Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Two Former DC Officers Charged in Overtime Fraud Appear on Jan. 6 Congressional Plaque

Two Former DC Officers Charged in Overtime Fraud Appear on Jan. 6 Congressional Plaque

The charges highlight a gap between public commemoration and ongoing criminal proceedings, a tension that Congress has not yet publicly addressed.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · August 19, 2026

Two former Metropolitan Police Department officers named on a congressional exhibit honoring Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot responders now face criminal charges in an overtime fraud scheme. A D.C. judge issued arrest warrants for former MPD Lieutenant Peter Sheldon and former Sergeant Frantz Fulcher, along with four other individuals, for allegedly filing false overtime hours and collecting tens of thousands of dollars as a result, according to an announcement from D.C. officials reported by the Washington Examiner on August 19, 2026.

Sheldon and Fulcher are among hundreds of officers whose names appear on a local exhibit installed by lawmakers to recognize service during the January 6 Capitol breach. The congressional plaque was created as part of a broader effort to formally acknowledge the law enforcement response that day, according to the Washington Examiner report. The exhibit has not been publicly revised or updated to reflect the pending charges as of the date of this publication.

The overtime fraud allegations are separate from the officers' conduct on January 6. The charges concern MPD administrative payroll records, not actions taken during the Capitol riot response. It is not known from available public records whether the alleged fraud occurred before, during, or after the period covered by the congressional commemoration. Court filings in the D.C. Superior Court case would contain a specific timeline of the alleged conduct.

Neither the House nor Senate has issued a statement addressing whether the plaque or exhibit will be reviewed in light of the charges, according to publicly available congressional records as of August 19, 2026. It is unknown which congressional office or committee holds jurisdiction over the exhibit and whether any process exists for revising it. A formal inquiry to the relevant committee would be the document most likely to clarify that procedure.

What remains unresolved in the public record: the precise dollar amounts Sheldon and Fulcher are each alleged to have received, the full list of charges filed, and whether any congressional office has initiated a review of the commemorative exhibit. D.C. Superior Court filings and any congressional correspondence with MPD leadership would answer those questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com