Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
US Elections

DSA Candidate Angie Nixon Defeats Alexander Vindman in Florida Senate Primary

DSA Candidate Angie Nixon Defeats Alexander Vindman in Florida Senate Primary

Nixon's win gives the Democratic Socialists of America a statewide nominee in Florida, though both parties' operatives project a Republican advantage in the November general election against...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · August 19, 2026

State Representative Angie Nixon, backed by the Democratic Socialists of America, defeated Alexander Vindman in Florida's special Democratic Senate primary on August 18, 2026, according to reporting by the New York Post citing results from Tuesday's contest. Vindman, a former National Security Council official who testified during the first impeachment inquiry of Donald Trump, had been considered a prominent contender entering the race.

Nixon's victory represents one of the largest electoral wins for the DSA at the statewide level, according to the New York Post report. The DSA is a dues-funded membership organization that has backed progressive primary candidates in congressional and state races since at least 2018. The specific vote totals from Tuesday's primary were not available in the source material reviewed by The Congressional Times. Those totals would be confirmed in Florida Division of Elections certified results, which are a public record.

Nixon will face Republican incumbent Ashley Moody in the November general election. Moody, a former Florida attorney general, holds the seat as a Republican incumbent in a state that has shifted toward Republicans in recent statewide cycles. Democratic strategist Adam Bozzi, quoted by the New York Post, said, 'Florida was already a stretch,' indicating that party operatives from both sides view the seat as favorable to Republicans in November.

The general election outcome will depend in part on voter registration totals, fundraising, and turnout models specific to the seat. Federal Election Commission filings for Nixon's and Moody's campaigns, which are publicly searchable at FEC.gov, would show each candidate's cash on hand and donor base as of the most recent reporting deadline. As of publication, those comparative figures were not available in the source material reviewed.

What remains unknown is the precise primary vote margin between Nixon and Vindman, the current FEC cash-on-hand totals for both general election candidates, and whether national Democratic Party committees such as the DSCC have committed independent expenditure support to Nixon's campaign. Florida Division of Elections certified results and FEC quarterly filings would answer those questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com