Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

76 Percent of Canadians Back End of U.S. Trade Talks, Poll Finds

76 Percent of Canadians Back End of U.S. Trade Talks, Poll Finds

The survey result signals that public opinion in Canada has hardened against resuming negotiations, which may complicate any future U.S. effort to reopen bilateral trade discussions that directly...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · August 24, 2026

A poll published by the Angus Reid Institute found that 76 percent of Canadian respondents said their country was correct in refusing U.S. terms and ending trade negotiations without reaching an agreement. Thirteen percent of respondents disagreed with that position, according to the Angus Reid Institute survey as reported by The Hill on August 24, 2026. The remaining respondents were not categorized in the available summary.

The breakdown of the U.S.-Canada trade relationship has direct consequences for American economic policy. Canada is among the largest trading partners of the United States, and the two countries exchange hundreds of billions of dollars in goods annually, according to U.S. Census Bureau trade data maintained at census.gov. Sectors including agriculture, automotive manufacturing, and energy have cross-border supply chains that are affected by the absence of a governing trade framework.

The status of any formal U.S. negotiating mandate for restarting talks is not confirmed in the source material. The Office of the United States Trade Representative, which holds statutory authority over such negotiations under 19 U.S.C. Section 2171, has not issued a public statement on next steps that is cited in the available record. The specific terms the U.S. offered that Canada rejected have not been detailed in the source material reviewed for this story.

What remains unknown includes the precise sticking points that led Canada to end talks, the timeline for any potential resumption of negotiations, and whether Congress has been formally briefed by USTR on the impasse. Congressional notification requirements for trade agreement status are governed by the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015. Transcripts of any relevant USTR briefings to the House Ways and Means Committee or the Senate Finance Committee would be the public records most likely to answer those questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com