Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

U.S. Plans to Revoke Up to 200,000 B1 and B2 Visas in Single Action

U.S. Plans to Revoke Up to 200,000 B1 and B2 Visas in Single Action

If executed, the revocation would roughly double the approximately 175,000 visas the Trump administration has already cancelled on criminal-activity grounds, marking a significant escalation in...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · August 25, 2026

The Trump administration is planning to revoke approximately 200,000 visas held by foreign nationals who entered the United States on B1 business visas or B2 tourist visas and subsequently applied for asylum, according to reporting by the Associated Press citing two unnamed U.S. officials and documents reviewed by that outlet. The Washington Examiner, citing the same AP reporting, described the planned action as the largest mass visa revocation in U.S. history.

The administration has already cancelled approximately 175,000 visas on grounds related to criminal activity, according to the same AP-sourced reporting. The new planned revocation, targeting an estimated 200,000 additional visa holders, would bring the total number of cancelled visas to roughly 375,000, based on the figures reported.

The specific legal authority the administration intends to invoke for the B1 and B2 revocations was not identified in the available source material. The Immigration and Nationality Act grants the Secretary of State broad authority to revoke visas under 8 U.S.C. Section 1201(i), though any formal legal basis cited by the administration would appear in a federal register notice, agency memorandum, or court filing if the action is challenged.

The plan, as reported, targets a specific subset of B1 and B2 holders: those who filed asylum applications after entering on those visa categories. The total universe of affected individuals and the timeline for implementation were not specified in the available source reporting. It is unknown whether formal revocation notices have been drafted or whether legal challenges have been filed. Any such challenges would appear in federal district court records, accessible through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system.

What remains unknown includes the precise legal instrument authorizing the action, the agency or agencies responsible for implementation, and whether any congressional notification has been made. A formal Department of Homeland Security or State Department announcement, a federal register notice, or a court filing would be the public records most likely to answer those questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com