Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Missouri Sues Baby Monitor Maker Over Alleged Chinese Military Ties

Missouri Sues Baby Monitor Maker Over Alleged Chinese Military Ties

The lawsuit tests how state attorneys general are using consumer protection law to address federal Pentagon designations of Chinese military-linked companies operating in U.S. consumer markets.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · June 15, 2026

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway filed a civil lawsuit on June 15, 2026, against Lorex Technology, a baby monitor manufacturer, alleging the company concealed its connections to Zhejiang Dahua Technology, a firm the U.S. Department of Defense designated as a Chinese military company in 2022 under Section 1260H of the National Defense Authorization Act. The lawsuit was reported by the Washington Examiner citing the filing.

According to the complaint, as described by the Washington Examiner, Lorex's hardware and software route data directly to Dahua's infrastructure, which the lawsuit alleges gives Dahua — and by extension entities connected to the Chinese government — access to data collected inside Missouri residents' homes. The Pentagon's 2022 designation of Dahua is a matter of public record and is documented in the Department of Defense's annual list of Chinese military companies, published pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1260H.

Lorex was previously a wholly owned subsidiary of Dahua before Taiwan-based Skywatch Innovation acquired the brand, according to the Washington Examiner's reporting on the complaint. The lawsuit's central allegation is that the post-acquisition Lorex continued to route data through Dahua systems without adequate disclosure to consumers, which Hanaway's office characterizes as a deceptive trade practice under Missouri law. The specific Missouri statute cited in the filing was not detailed in available public reporting as of publication.

The lawsuit is one of several state-level legal actions directed at consumer technology products with supply chain ties to Pentagon-designated Chinese military companies. Missouri's action is distinct from federal enforcement proceedings; no parallel federal lawsuit, FTC action, or Department of Justice filing related to Lorex has been confirmed in publicly available records as of June 15, 2026.

Several material facts remain unknown from available public records. It is not yet confirmed what specific damages or injunctive relief Missouri is seeking, what Lorex or Skywatch Innovation have stated in response to the complaint, or whether the filing includes technical evidence beyond the corporate ownership history. The full text of the complaint, which would be filed in Missouri state court and would be a public record upon docketing, would resolve these questions. Lorex and Skywatch Innovation had not issued publicly documented responses as of the time of publication.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com