Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Elections

South Carolina's 1st District Sets November Matchup After Dual Runoffs

South Carolina's 1st District Sets November Matchup After Dual Runoffs

A fired Navy admiral faces a Charleston County councilwoman in a district that Republicans have held for decades, creating one of the more closely watched House races of the 2026 cycle.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · June 24, 2026

Two runoff elections held in South Carolina's 1st Congressional District on June 24, 2026, produced the general election matchup that will determine who holds the seat vacated by Rep. Nancy Mace. On the Democratic side, former Navy Admiral Nancy Lacore won the Democratic runoff, according to results reported by The New York Times. On the Republican side, Jenny Costa Honeycutt, a Charleston County councilwoman and attorney, defeated her Republican runoff opponent, according to the same report.

Lacore's background includes a dismissal from naval service, the circumstances of which have not been independently detailed in the available public record. The precise basis for that separation — and any relevant administrative or military proceedings — would be contained in Department of Defense personnel records or any formal review documents that may be publicly available through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Honeycutt currently serves on the Charleston County Council. Her legal and professional background has not been detailed in the available source material beyond her identification as a lawyer. Her campaign finance disclosures, which would detail donor networks and fundraising totals, are filed with the Federal Election Commission and are publicly searchable at fec.gov under her registered candidate committee.

South Carolina's 1st District, which encompasses the Charleston metro area and surrounding coastal counties, has returned Republican candidates in recent general elections. The Cook Political Report and similar nonpartisan outlets have historically rated the seat as Republican-leaning, though The New York Times reporting on the Democratic runoff noted that party operatives believe the seat could be competitive in November 2026.

Key unknowns include each candidate's current fundraising totals for the general election period, the margin of victory in both runoffs, and any independent expenditure activity from outside groups. FEC quarterly filings, due July 15, 2026, for the period ending June 30, 2026, would provide the first comprehensive look at general election financial positioning for both campaigns.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com