Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Save Our Bacon Act Would Preempt State Pork Standards in Farm Bill

Save Our Bacon Act Would Preempt State Pork Standards in Farm Bill

A provision backed by corporate pork producers, including foreign-owned Smithfield Foods, would override voter-approved state laws governing pig confinement — raising a federalism question that...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · June 24, 2026

Legislation known as the Save Our Bacon Act, currently under consideration for inclusion in the 2026 Farm Bill, would prohibit individual states from enforcing their own standards governing the sale of pork products produced under conditions that do not meet those states' animal welfare requirements, according to the bill's legislative text as introduced in the 119th Congress. Proponents of the measure, including the National Pork Producers Council, argue that a patchwork of state laws creates an unworkable compliance burden for national producers. Opponents, including family-farm advocates and state-rights groups, contend the bill would nullify ballot measures already passed by voters in California (Proposition 12, 2018) and Massachusetts (Question 3, 2016), both of which set minimum space requirements for farm animals whose products are sold within those states. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld California's Proposition 12 in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross (599 U.S. 641, 2023), ruling 5–4 that the law did not violate the dormant Commerce Clause. The Save Our Bacon Act would achieve through statute what the industry could not achieve through litigation. Smithfield Foods, the world's largest pork processor and a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based WH Group since 2013 — a corporate structure on record with the Securities and Exchange Commission — has been identified by Washington Examiner reporting (June 2026) as among the corporate interests pressing Congress to include the preemption language in the farm bill. Smithfield's federal lobbying disclosures filed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act are publicly searchable at lda.senate.gov; its most recent quarterly filings show active lobbying on agricultural trade and farm bill provisions, though the precise dollar figures for the current reporting period will not be public until the next LDA filing deadline. What remains unknown is whether the Save Our Bacon Act language will be included in the House or Senate version of the Farm Bill markup; the House Agriculture Committee's markup schedule as of June 24, 2026 has not yet been published. The committee's official markup notices, once released, would confirm the provision's status. Separately, it is unknown how individual members of the Agriculture committees have voted or signaled on the preemption provision; member statements entered into the Congressional Record would provide that documentation.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com