Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Senate OBBBA Includes 10% Tax on Gambling Losses, House Bill Did Not

Senate OBBBA Includes 10% Tax on Gambling Losses, House Bill Did Not

A provision added in the Senate version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act creates a new tax structure for gambling losses that was absent from the House-passed text, raising questions about who...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · June 29, 2026

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, now signed into law, contains a provision in Section 70114 that imposes a 10% tax on gambling losses, according to a Washington Examiner analysis of the legislation published June 29, 2026. The provision was not present in the House-passed version of the bill, meaning it was inserted during the Senate reconciliation process.

Under the enacted language of Section 70114, taxpayers who incur gambling losses would face a 10% levy on those losses. The House-passed version of the OBBBA did not include a comparable gambling-loss tax, according to the same Washington Examiner review. The legislative record — including the House-passed text and the enrolled Senate amendments — is publicly available through Congress.gov and would confirm the specific statutory differences between the two versions.

The provision affects any taxpayer who itemizes gambling losses, a category that spans millions of Americans who participate in legal sports betting, casino gaming, and lottery activity. The American Gaming Association reported in its 2025 State of the States publication that legal commercial gaming revenue in the United States exceeded $67 billion in 2024, indicating a large potential taxpayer base that could be subject to the new provision.

No floor debate entry in the Congressional Record reviewed at time of publication specifically addresses the origin or sponsor of the Section 70114 gambling-loss language. The Senate Finance Committee markup records, which are a public document, would identify which senator or staff amendment introduced the provision and at what stage of the reconciliation process it was added.

What remains unknown: It is not yet confirmed whether any member of Congress has formally introduced legislation — sometimes referred to informally as a "Reconciliation 3.0" vehicle — to repeal or modify Section 70114. A search of Congress.gov bill introductions as of June 29, 2026, would reveal any such filing. The Joint Committee on Taxation's revenue score for the gambling-loss provision has not been independently located; that score, if published, would quantify the federal revenue impact and the average tax burden per affected filer.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com