Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Garamendi Amendment Seeks to Block $150M Pentagon Funds for White House Ballroom

Garamendi Amendment Seeks to Block $150M Pentagon Funds for White House Ballroom

The amendment, introduced to the NDAA, tests congressional authority over executive construction spending funded through defense appropriations.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · June 30, 2026

Rep. John Garamendi (D-Calif.), a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, announced plans to introduce a floor amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that would fully restrict at least $150 million in Pentagon funds from being applied to the construction of a ballroom at the White House, according to reporting by The Hill published June 28, 2026. Garamendi is among the senior Democratic members of the Armed Services Committee, a panel with direct jurisdiction over Pentagon appropriations and spending authorizations.

The amendment targets a specific line of military funding the Trump administration has directed — or is reported to be directing — toward White House renovation and construction. The precise appropriations account or budget line from which the $150 million figure is drawn has not been identified in publicly available documents as of this writing. The full text of Garamendi's amendment, which would clarify the source account and restriction mechanism, would be found in the official NDAA amendment filings submitted to the House Rules Committee or published in the Congressional Record upon floor consideration.

The NDAA is an annual must-pass piece of legislation that authorizes defense spending and sets policy for the Department of Defense. Floor amendments to the NDAA are a standard legislative mechanism for members of both parties to impose spending restrictions or policy riders. The amendment process is governed by rules set by the House Rules Committee for each year's bill. Whether Garamendi's amendment will receive a floor vote depends on whether the Rules Committee makes it in order — a procedural decision that has not yet been publicly reported.

The White House has not issued a public statement responding to Garamendi's announced amendment as of June 30, 2026. No Republican member of the House Armed Services Committee has been reported as co-sponsoring or opposing the specific amendment on the record at this time. The administration's legal authority to redirect Pentagon funds to White House construction projects has not been adjudicated in any publicly identified court filing.

Key facts that remain unknown include: the specific Pentagon appropriations account identified as the funding source, the full amendment text and any exceptions it contains, and whether the Rules Committee will grant the amendment a floor vote. The Congressional Record, the House Rules Committee's published amendment list for the NDAA, and USASpending.gov contract data for White House construction would be the primary public records that could answer these questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com