Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Congressional Record

Nine House Republicans Introduce Bill to Repeal 17th Amendment

Nine House Republicans Introduce Bill to Repeal 17th Amendment

A proposal to return U.S. Senate elections to state legislatures would require ratification by three-fourths of states — a threshold no constitutional amendment has cleared since 1992.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 4, 2026

Nine Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives have introduced legislation to repeal the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, according to reporting by the Daily Caller published July 4, 2026. The 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, established the direct popular election of U.S. senators, replacing the original constitutional mechanism under Article I, Section 3, which granted state legislatures the power to choose their state's two senators.

The bill's sponsors argue that returning Senate selection to state legislatures would restore a structural check on federal power originally designed by the framers. The names and district affiliations of all nine sponsors are listed in the congressional record accompanying the bill's introduction; the specific bill number was not confirmed in available source material at time of publication. The Congressional Record and the House Clerk's office would contain the full text and co-sponsor list.

Repeal of any constitutional amendment requires passage by a two-thirds vote in both chambers of Congress and subsequent ratification by three-fourths — currently 38 — of state legislatures, per Article V of the U.S. Constitution. No constitutional amendment has been ratified since the 27th Amendment was certified on May 7, 1992, according to the National Archives. Previous legislative efforts to repeal the 17th Amendment have not advanced beyond introduction in recent Congresses; a search of Congress.gov for prior sessions would show the comparative history of such proposals.

The proposal arrives as a separate Gallup survey, released in the days surrounding the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence on July 4, 2026, found that 64 percent of Americans report pride in their country, with 53 percent describing themselves as 'very' or 'extremely' proud, according to Gallup's published results. The survey did not include a question on the 17th Amendment specifically.

What remains unknown at time of publication includes the full list of co-sponsors, the assigned bill number, whether any Senate companion legislation has been introduced, and whether any House committee has scheduled a hearing. The House Judiciary Committee's published calendar and Congress.gov bill tracking would be the authoritative public records to answer those questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com