Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

95% of U.S. Adults Say Country Faces Affordability Crisis, Poll Finds

95% of U.S. Adults Say Country Faces Affordability Crisis, Poll Finds

A Harris Poll survey conducted for The Guardian reveals near-universal concern about living costs, with fieldwork completed before the most recent round of federal tariff adjustments took effect —...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 8, 2026

Ninety-five percent of U.S. adults believe the United States is experiencing an affordability crisis, according to a Harris Poll survey conducted for The Guardian and released Wednesday, July 2, 2026. The poll sampled U.S. adults and asked respondents to assess current living costs nationwide; the specific margin of error, sample size, and exact fieldwork dates were not fully disclosed in the initial published summary, and The Guardian's full methodology document would be the authoritative source for those figures.

The survey result places cost-of-living concerns at a level that spans traditional partisan divisions. Harris Poll, a publicly registered market research firm, conducted the poll on behalf of The Guardian; no government agency or political committee funded the survey, according to the published report. The Congressional Times was unable to independently verify the complete questionnaire wording at time of publication, which matters because question framing can influence response distributions in affordability polling.

The report was completed before the United States implemented its most recent schedule of tariff adjustments in 2026, according to The Guardian's own disclosure. That timing gap is material: the Congressional Budget Office, in its most recent economic outlook (CBO, May 2026), projected that broad-based import tariffs could add between 0.5 and 1.5 percentage points to consumer price index measurements over a 12-month horizon, depending on trade partner retaliation levels. Whether respondents would answer differently under current tariff conditions is unknown.

Federal data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers rose 3.4 percent year-over-year as of the most recent monthly release available; the BLS publishes this figure monthly at bls.gov. Separately, the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation metric, the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, has remained above the Fed's 2 percent target for more than 36 consecutive months, according to Bureau of Economic Analysis records.

Congressional responses to affordability concerns have taken divergent legislative forms. House Republicans passed H.R. 1 in May 2025 — a budget reconciliation package that included tax cut extensions — with proponents arguing the measure would reduce household burdens; the Congressional Budget Office scored the bill as adding approximately $3.8 trillion to the deficit over ten years (CBO cost estimate, May 2025). Senate Democrats have separately introduced the Affordable Prices Act (S. 1142, 119th Congress), which would authorize FTC oversight of price-gouging in essential goods sectors; that bill remains in committee as of publication date.

What remains unknown: the full Harris Poll methodology including sample size, margin of error, precise fieldwork dates, and sub-group breakdowns by income, region, and party affiliation. The Guardian's complete published report and Harris Poll's public methodology disclosure are the documents that would answer those questions. The Congressional Times will update this story when that information becomes available.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com