Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

U.S. Strikes on Iran Continue as Copper Markets Register Limited Reaction

U.S. Strikes on Iran Continue as Copper Markets Register Limited Reaction

Commodity markets' muted response to ongoing U.S. military action against Iran may signal that investors are pricing in prolonged engagement, a dynamic with downstream implications for U.S....

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 9, 2026

Copper prices rose on Wednesday, July 9, 2026, snapping a two-day decline despite a fresh round of U.S. military strikes on Iran, according to market data reported by Bloomberg. The report noted that traders redirected focus toward long-term demand projections tied to artificial intelligence infrastructure rather than near-term geopolitical risk. The price movement provides a market-based data point as Congress weighs authorization and funding questions related to U.S. military operations in the region.

The strikes represent continued U.S. military engagement with Iran, an operation with direct implications for congressional oversight responsibilities under the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. § 1541–1548), which requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities and limits unauthorized engagements to 60 days. Whether the administration has filed the required notifications with congressional leadership is not confirmed in available public records; the relevant document would be a War Powers Report submitted to the Speaker of the House and Senate President pro tempore.

Congressional oversight of military expenditures tied to the strikes falls under the jurisdiction of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees and the defense subcommittees of the Appropriations Committees in both chambers. No public committee hearings or emergency supplemental appropriations requests directly linked to the current Iran strikes have been confirmed in the congressional record as of this publication date. The specific costs of the operations are not yet reflected in any publicly available USASpending.gov obligation data.

Separately, U.S. federal law enforcement agencies conducted raids this week targeting three India-based transnational crime organizations operating within the United States, according to the New York Post, citing Los Angeles County District Attorney Bill Essayli. Federal agents served 34 search warrants in California alone — 23 in the Sacramento region and 11 in the Los Angeles area — resulting in 24 arrests across the United States, Canada, and Europe, including 11 in California. The Justice Department has not yet published a formal press release confirming charges, case numbers, or the specific federal statutes invoked; those details would appear in public court filings on PACER.

What remains unknown: the precise legal authority cited by the administration for the Iran strikes, the total appropriated funds obligated to the operations, and whether a formal War Powers notification has been transmitted to Congress. The War Powers Report, if filed, would be publicly accessible through the House Foreign Affairs Committee or Senate Foreign Relations Committee records. Full charging documents for the transnational crime arrests, once unsealed, would appear in the relevant federal district court dockets.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com