Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Washington Post-Ipsos Poll: 46% Say Supreme Court Rulings Follow Political Views

Washington Post-Ipsos Poll: 46% Say Supreme Court Rulings Follow Political Views

A decline in public confidence in the Supreme Court's impartiality, if sustained, could affect the institutional legitimacy the Court relies on to enforce its rulings without executive or...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 18, 2026

Nearly half of American adults — 46 percent — believe the Supreme Court decides cases involving Trump administration policies based on the justices' political views rather than the law, according to a Washington Post-Ipsos poll conducted in early July 2026 and reported by The Hill on July 18, 2026. Only one-quarter of respondents said they believe the Court rules based on the law, with the remainder expressing uncertainty or mixed views.

The poll did not break down respondents by party affiliation in the summary reported by The Hill, making it unknown whether the confidence gap is driven primarily by Democratic, Republican, or independent respondents. A full partisan crosstab would be available in the Washington Post-Ipsos poll's complete methodology release, which had not been publicly published in full as of this report's publication date.

Public confidence surveys of the Supreme Court have been conducted periodically by Gallup, Pew Research Center, and other organizations. A Gallup poll from September 2023 found Supreme Court approval at 40 percent, the lowest recorded in that series at the time. The current Washington Post-Ipsos figure represents a distinct question — whether rulings are ideology-driven rather than law-driven — and is not directly comparable to approval ratings from prior surveys.

The Supreme Court's current term has included rulings on multiple cases directly involving the Trump administration's executive actions. The specific cases and their outcomes would be found in the official Supreme Court docket, publicly available at supremecourt.gov. None of the nine current justices had issued public statements in response to the poll findings as of July 18, 2026.

What remains unknown: the poll's full sample size, margin of error, exact question wording, and partisan breakdown of respondents. The Washington Post's release of the complete poll methodology and crosstabs would answer each of these questions. It is also unknown whether confidence levels differ significantly across demographic groups such as age, education level, or geographic region — data the full poll release would contain.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com