Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Political Intelligence

Republican Senators Respond to DSA Proposal to Abolish Senate and Electoral College

Republican Senators Respond to DSA Proposal to Abolish Senate and Electoral College

The Democratic Socialists of America's formal platform calls for eliminating two constitutional structures, drawing written responses from Republican members of the Senate — the body that would...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 22, 2026

Republican U.S. senators have issued public statements opposing a Democratic Socialists of America platform plank calling for the abolition of the U.S. Senate and the Electoral College, according to reporting by Fox News published July 22, 2026. The DSA, a registered nonprofit political organization, has listed both abolition measures as part of its stated national priorities, which are publicly available on the organization's website.

The U.S. Senate is established by Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution, and the Electoral College is established by Article II, Section 1. Abolishing either institution would require a constitutional amendment under Article V, which mandates passage by two-thirds of both chambers of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures — 38 of 50 states. No such amendment has been introduced in the current Congress, according to a search of Congress.gov as of the publication date.

The DSA is a separate organization from the Democratic Party. No current member of the Democratic caucus in the Senate or House has publicly endorsed the DSA's abolition proposals, based on available congressional records and public statements as of July 22, 2026. The Fox News report did not identify specific Democratic officeholders as supporting the measures.

The specific Republican senators quoted, the text of their statements, and the DSA document version cited were not fully detailed in the available source material. The complete text of any senator's formal correspondence or floor statement, if entered into the record, would be retrievable through the Congressional Record at congress.gov.

What remains unknown: whether any sitting member of Congress has formally introduced legislation aligned with the DSA proposals, and whether the Republican statements were submitted as official congressional record entries or issued solely as press releases. The Congressional Record and Congress.gov bill search would resolve both questions.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com