Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Trump Signals Broader Iran Strikes Amid Congressional Transparency Concerns

Trump Signals Broader Iran Strikes Amid Congressional Transparency Concerns

Two weeks after a ceasefire collapse, the administration's daily bombing campaign and public escalation threats are testing the boundaries of executive war authority without a formal congressional...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 24, 2026

President Donald Trump stated publicly this week that the United States is considering expanding its military campaign against Iran to include Iranian infrastructure and suspected nuclear sites, specifically naming Pickaxe Mountain as a potential target, according to reporting by the Washington Examiner published July 24, 2026. The statements follow the collapse of a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran approximately two weeks prior to that date.

U.S. Central Command has continued to announce daily bombing operations since the ceasefire ended, with the stated objective of degrading Iran's capacity to threaten commercial shipping in adjacent waterways, per the Washington Examiner report. The frequency and scope of those announcements have not been matched by a corresponding public disclosure of legal authorities, rules of engagement, or casualty figures.

The transparency concerns referenced in the Washington Examiner report center on the administration's conduct of the conflict without a new Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). Congress has not voted on a formal war authorization specific to Iran in the current conflict, according to the congressional record as of July 24, 2026. The existing statutory framework — including the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs — has not been publicly cited by the administration as the legal basis for the current operations, and the White House has not published a formal legal memo to that effect, per available public records.

Several members of Congress have raised questions about executive branch reporting obligations under the War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. § 1541–1548), which requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing armed forces into hostilities and limits unauthorized engagements to 60 days absent congressional approval. Whether the administration has filed a compliant War Powers notification with congressional leadership is not confirmed in publicly available congressional records as of this publication date.

What remains unknown includes the precise legal authority the administration is relying upon for the campaign, the total number of strikes conducted by CENTCOM since the ceasefire collapse, any classified damage assessments filed with the congressional intelligence committees, and the operational scope of any planned expansion to Iranian nuclear sites. The documents that would answer these questions are: a War Powers Resolution notification to Congress, any administration legal opinion on statutory authority, CENTCOM operational reports filed under 10 U.S.C. § 427, and classified briefings provided to the Senate Armed Services Committee and House Armed Services Committee.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com