Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

Former Navy SEAL Convicted in Plot to Bomb Officers at California Protest

Former Navy SEAL Convicted in Plot to Bomb Officers at California Protest

The case illustrates how federal domestic terrorism statutes are being applied to defendants with military backgrounds, raising questions about post-service screening and radicalization pathways.

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · July 28, 2026

A former U.S. Navy SEAL was convicted of plotting to detonate explosives targeting law enforcement officers during a 'No Kings' protest in California, according to federal court records. Gregory Vandenberg, 49, was arrested after a store clerk reported his suspicious behavior to investigators, who subsequently identified him as the suspect, per reporting corroborated by federal court filings cited by the New York Post on July 28, 2026.

Federal prosecutors charged Vandenberg under statutes governing the use of explosive devices to attack government personnel, according to the court record in the case. The specific charges and the federal district court in which the case was filed were not fully detailed in the available source material; the relevant charging document and docket number, available through PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records), would confirm the precise counts and statutory citations.

The arrest followed a tip from a retail store clerk who alerted federal investigators to Vandenberg's conduct prior to the planned attack, according to the New York Post's account citing investigators. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force are the agencies typically assigned to explosive-device cases of this nature; which agency led the investigation has not been confirmed in the source material and would be disclosed in the criminal complaint filed with the court.

The 'No Kings' protests referenced in the case have occurred across multiple U.S. cities in 2025 and 2026 in response to executive branch actions; federal law enforcement has previously stated publicly that it monitors protest events for potential threats to public safety, without targeting protected First Amendment activity. No other individuals have been publicly charged in connection with this specific alleged plot, based on available court records as of July 28, 2026.

What remains unknown: the specific federal statutes cited in the indictment or criminal complaint, the sentencing date and applicable guidelines range, and whether any co-conspirators were identified during the investigation. The full case record, including the indictment, plea or verdict transcript, and sentencing memorandum, is publicly accessible through PACER under the relevant district court docket.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com