Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Politics

Senate Democrat Calls Pulte DNI Appointment Most Dangerous Intelligence Move

Senate Democrat Calls Pulte DNI Appointment Most Dangerous Intelligence Move

The appointment of a figure with no confirmed intelligence background to the nation's top spy post raises structural questions about continuity and congressional oversight of the intelligence...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · June 8, 2026

Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT), the ranking Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, stated on CBS News' 'Face the Nation' on June 8, 2026, that President Trump's appointment of Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence was, in his words, the president's 'most dangerous' appointment. The characterization was made during a live interview with moderator Margaret Brennan, as reported by CBS News.

Bill Pulte, known primarily as a philanthropist and social media personality, was tapped by the Trump administration to serve in an acting capacity as Director of National Intelligence (DNI), a position that oversees all 18 components of the U.S. Intelligence Community. The DNI role was established by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458) following recommendations of the 9/11 Commission. Acting appointments to the DNI position do not require Senate confirmation, a legal provision that lawmakers in both parties have periodically debated since the office's creation.

A word from our sponsor: Have you thought about life insurance or annuities but didn't want the sales pressure? PolicyPrepper.com is a free, no-pressure educational platform with a built-in AI that answers all your questions — no agent calls, no obligation. Check it out at PolicyPrepper.com.

Himes did not specify in the CBS News broadcast which particular policy position or action by Pulte prompted the 'most dangerous' assessment, nor did he cite a specific intelligence operation or directive as evidence. CBS News correspondent Olivia Gazis covered the exchange. The White House has not issued a formal statement responding to Himes' characterization, as of the publication of this article. Pulte's tenure as acting DNI, including its start date and the precise legal authority under which he was appointed, had not been detailed in a publicly available White House press release or Federal Register notice as of June 8, 2026.

Congress has formal oversight authority over the intelligence community under the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, and the House and Senate Intelligence Committees receive classified briefings from the DNI. Whether acting DNI Pulte has appeared before either committee in a classified or open session, and the substance of any such appearance, is not part of the public record. Republican members of the House or Senate Intelligence Committees had not issued public statements, as of press time, either supporting or criticizing the Pulte appointment.

What remains unknown includes the specific executive order or presidential directive authorizing the acting appointment, the anticipated duration of the acting role, and whether a permanent nominee has been submitted to the Senate for confirmation. The Federal Register and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence's public website would be the primary documents to establish the formal legal basis for the appointment. A Senate confirmation hearing record, if and when one is scheduled, would provide a public accounting of Pulte's qualifications and policy positions under oath.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com