Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Political Intelligence

DSA Candidates Win Democratic Primaries in Denver, New York, Washington D.C.

DSA Candidates Win Democratic Primaries in Denver, New York, Washington D.C.

A string of primary victories by Democratic Socialists of America-affiliated candidates in major U.S. cities marks a measurable shift in the ideological composition of local Democratic Party...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · August 7, 2026

Democratic Socialists of America-affiliated candidates have secured victories in Democratic primary contests in Denver, New York City, and Washington, D.C., according to reporting by the Washington Examiner published in August 2026. The wins represent an increase in DSA-aligned officeholders at municipal and local levels, which historically serve as pipelines to federal legislative bodies including the U.S. House of Representatives.

The DSA, a national political organization that describes itself as the largest socialist organization in the United States, has endorsed candidates in local, state, and federal races since at least 2016. Current U.S. House members who have received DSA endorsements include Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), both of whom are on record publicly identifying with democratic socialist policy positions. Their Federal Election Commission filings and endorsement disclosures are publicly available at FEC.gov.

The Washington Examiner report highlighted that several DSA-affiliated candidates gaining traction are immigrants or children of immigrants from countries with histories of socialist governance. Among those named is Nithya Raman, identified as a Los Angeles-area figure with DSA ties. Raman serves on the Los Angeles City Council representing District 4; her local election disclosures are available through the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission.

The DSA's formal organizational filings, including its Internal Revenue Service Form 990 records as a 501(c)(4) organization, are publicly searchable through the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search tool and ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer. These documents disclose the organization's revenue, expenditures, and leadership on an annual basis.

What remains unknown from currently available public records is the total dollar value of in-kind support, canvassing coordination, and independent expenditures that DSA chapters directed toward each of the cited primary races. Campaign finance filings with the relevant state election authorities in Colorado, New York, and Washington, D.C. — specifically independent expenditure reports — would provide that data. The Federal Election Commission filings of any DSA-affiliated federal PACs would similarly disclose direct contribution activity to federal candidates.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com