Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Fauci Texts Show Private Pregnancy Vaccine Concerns Differed From Public Statements

Fauci Texts Show Private Pregnancy Vaccine Concerns Differed From Public Statements

Newly released government communications reveal a gap between what senior federal health officials said publicly about COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and what they expressed privately — a...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · August 10, 2026

Text messages sent to or from Dr. Anthony Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic, released as part of a congressional inquiry, show that Fauci, then-CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, and then-Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy privately discussed concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women, according to reporting by the Washington Examiner citing the disclosed communications. The release represents the first batch of texts obtained by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which is conducting oversight of federal health agency communications during the pandemic.

The public guidance from federal health agencies during the period in question consistently encouraged pregnant individuals to receive COVID-19 vaccines. The CDC's official website, archived through the Wayback Machine and current CDC records, stated that COVID-19 vaccines were recommended for people who are pregnant, recently pregnant, or planning to become pregnant. The precise wording and timing of the private text exchanges relative to those public recommendations has not been fully disclosed in the first document release.

The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, whose jurisdiction includes government oversight and the examination of federal agencies, has not yet released the full text of the messages or a complete timeline of the communications. The subcommittee's chairmanship and the specific senators driving the inquiry were not fully detailed in the available source material at time of publication. The subcommittee's records, which are public congressional documents, would identify the lead investigators and the scope of the document request.

Neither Dr. Fauci, who departed as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in December 2022, nor Dr. Walensky, who left the CDC in June 2023, have issued publicly recorded statements in response to the first batch of released texts as of August 10, 2026. Dr. Murthy's current status as Surgeon General ended with the change of administration; no public response from him regarding the texts was available in the source material.

What remains unknown includes the complete contents of the first batch of texts, the methodology used to obtain them, whether the communications were produced voluntarily or under subpoena, and whether additional batches are forthcoming. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations' official records, including any subpoena logs or document production agreements, would answer those questions. The full text of the communications, if entered into the congressional record, would constitute the primary public document for independent verification of any specific claims about the nature of the private concerns expressed.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com