Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Federal Policy

Trump Posts AI Tanker Image, Floats Hormuz Territory Claim

Trump Posts AI Tanker Image, Floats Hormuz Territory Claim

A sitting president's public statements about designating an international waterway as U.S. territory would carry significant legal and diplomatic consequences under the United Nations Convention...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · August 15, 2026

President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated image on Truth Social on Friday, August 15, 2026, depicting himself participating in the seizure of an Iranian-flagged oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz. The post was captioned 'It's Our Oil Tanker Now,' according to reporting by the New York Post citing the Truth Social post directly.

Hours before the post, Trump stated at a public event on Long Island that 'Pretty soon, I will be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States,' according to the same New York Post report. The White House has not released a formal policy document, executive order, or national security directive outlining any legal mechanism for such a declaration as of the time of publication.

The Strait of Hormuz is an international waterway through which, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's most recent published data, approximately 20 percent of global petroleum liquids transit annually. Jurisdiction over international straits is governed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The United States has signed but not ratified that treaty, a status confirmed by the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee record.

The Truth Social post coincided with a report, also cited by the New York Post, that a U.S. ally stated Iran had fired on a separate commercial vessel in the region. The identity of the ally and the vessel were not specified in the available source material. No U.S. military statement, Pentagon press release, or State Department advisory confirming the incident had been made public as of this writing.

What remains unknown is whether any formal interagency legal review, National Security Council directive, or congressional consultation has occurred regarding the president's stated intent. A National Security Council meeting record, a State Department legal opinion, or a formal White House communication to congressional leadership under the War Powers Resolution would be the public documents most likely to clarify the administration's legal basis, if any exists.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com