ABC Sues FCC, Seeks Injunction on Eight Broadcast License Reviews
The lawsuit tests whether federal broadcast regulators can initiate license reviews against a network whose parent company is engaged in separate legal disputes with the administration.
Disney's ABC filed a lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Tuesday, August 18, 2026, according to reporting by the New York Post. The complaint seeks a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction that would halt the FCC's active review of eight Disney-held broadcast licenses, including ABC-affiliated stations in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago. The filing also requests a hearing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
The complaint, as described in court filings cited by the New York Post, alleges that the FCC's license review process constitutes a retaliatory action tied to the content and editorial direction of ABC's programming. The specific legal theories underlying the claim, including any First Amendment or Administrative Procedure Act arguments, would be detailed in the full complaint, which is a public record available through the federal PACER court filing system under the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
The FCC has statutory authority under 47 U.S.C. Section 309 to review and renew broadcast licenses held by television stations. License reviews are a standard regulatory function, though the timing and selection of stations subject to heightened scrutiny are decisions made at the commission's discretion. The FCC had not issued a public statement responding to the lawsuit as of the time of this report, according to available public records.
This filing follows a pattern of legal conflict between major media organizations and federal regulators that has played out across multiple courts in 2025 and 2026. The outcome of ABC's request for a temporary restraining order will depend on whether the court finds the network has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits and risk of irreparable harm, the standard threshold for preliminary injunctive relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65.
Several material facts remain unknown at this time. The full text of the complaint, including the specific counts filed, has not been independently reviewed by this publication. It is also unknown whether the FCC has formally responded to the court or filed a motion to dismiss. The complete complaint is available as a public record through PACER, and any FCC response would be filed in the same docket. The court's ruling on the temporary restraining order request would also be a public record upon issuance.