Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Legal Intelligence

DOJ Opens Civil Rights Probe Into William and Mary Scholarship Programs

DOJ Opens Civil Rights Probe Into William and Mary Scholarship Programs

The investigation marks a continuation of the Justice Department's post-Students for Fair Admissions scrutiny of race-conscious financial aid and student benefit programs at federally funded...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · August 18, 2026

The U.S. Department of Justice announced Monday that its Civil Rights Division has opened a formal investigation into the College of William and Mary, a public university in Williamsburg, Virginia, over allegations that certain scholarship and student benefit programs favor applicants based on race or ethnicity. The announcement was reported by The Hill on August 18, 2026.

The Civil Rights Division stated it will examine whether the university's programs violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars institutions receiving federal financial assistance from discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin. William and Mary receives federal funding through student financial aid disbursements and federal research grants, making it subject to Title VI requirements under 20 U.S.C. Section 1681 and related statutes.

The DOJ did not specify in its announcement which scholarship programs or student organizations are under review, nor did it disclose the total dollar value of the aid programs in question. A full accounting of federal funding flowing to William and Mary is publicly available through the USASpending.gov database, which tracks grants and contracts by recipient institution. The university had not issued a public response as of the time of the original report.

The investigation follows the Supreme Court's June 2023 ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, which held that race-conscious admissions programs at those institutions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Since that ruling, the DOJ and the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights have each opened reviews at multiple universities, though a comprehensive public list of all institutions currently under investigation has not been released by either agency.

What remains unknown is which specific programs triggered the William and Mary referral, whether the probe was initiated by a complaint or through agency-directed review, and what timeline the Civil Rights Division has set for completing its findings. The DOJ's case file, if opened as a formal matter, would eventually be subject to Freedom of Information Act requests under 5 U.S.C. Section 552, which would be the primary public record avenue for obtaining those details.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com