Intelligence. Accountability. Analysis.
Est. 2022 · Washington, D.C.
The Congressional Times
★★★
We follow the data, not the narrative
◆ Live Intelligence
Loading...
Analysis Loading today's analysis...
Crypto Markets

MSCI Rules Adopted Oct. 15 May Remove Strategy From Global Equity Indexes

MSCI Rules Adopted Oct. 15 May Remove Strategy From Global Equity Indexes

If Strategy loses inclusion in MSCI's Global Investable Market Indexes after Nov. 30, the forced selling by index-tracking funds could reduce demand for its shares and, by extension, its capacity...

Gab-E Intelligence Platform · October 16, 2026

MSCI announced on Oct. 15, 2026, that it will adopt a revised index methodology excluding companies classified as non-operating businesses from its Global Investable Market Indexes, according to CryptoSlate. The changes take effect after the Nov. 30, 2026, market close.

Strategy, the Nasdaq-listed company formerly known as MicroStrategy, holds Bitcoin as its primary corporate asset and has been flagged as a candidate for exclusion under the new classification criteria, according to reporting by Bitcoin Magazine. MSCI has not yet issued a final ruling on Strategy's specific status; that determination is expected before the Nov. 30 implementation date.

The new MSCI methodology targets companies that generate little or no revenue from traditional business operations and instead hold financial assets, such as cryptocurrency, as their core activity. Strategy reported total revenues of approximately $116 million for fiscal year 2024, according to its annual report filed with the SEC, while its Bitcoin holdings were valued at over $40 billion at various points during the same period, based on the company's own disclosures.

Exclusion from the MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes would matter financially because index-tracking funds, including exchange-traded funds and institutional portfolios benchmarked to MSCI, are required to hold constituent stocks in proportion to their index weight. Removal of a stock triggers mandatory selling by those funds. CryptoSlate reported an estimated $2.8 billion in selling pressure could result from exclusion, though the methodology behind that figure was not fully detailed in the available source material and should be treated as an estimate pending MSCI's formal weighting disclosure.

Strategy shares were trading approximately 69 percent below their peak price as of the date of the CryptoSlate report, according to that outlet. The exact peak price and the date it was reached were not specified in the source material; the company's SEC filings would contain the complete share price history.

Strategy's approach to capital markets is central to understanding why index membership matters to its business model. The company has repeatedly issued equity and convertible notes to raise cash, then used the proceeds to purchase Bitcoin. If its share price declines significantly, the cost of raising new capital increases, which could slow the pace of Bitcoin acquisitions. The precise relationship between any single index event and future capital raises would depend on market conditions at the time of any offering.

MSCI's decision to move forward with the proposal follows a consultation period during which market participants could submit feedback. The index provider has not publicly disclosed the volume or content of responses received during that process. MSCI's official methodology documents are publicly available on its website and would constitute the authoritative source for the final rules.

The timing of the change places it in the final weeks of the fourth quarter, a period when institutional portfolios undergo end-of-year rebalancing. Any index-driven selling would be layered on top of routine rebalancing activity, though the net effect on Strategy's share price is unknown and would depend on concurrent buyer demand.

Separately, Deutsche Bank is reported to be preparing a Bitcoin custody service for launch within weeks, according to Bitcoin Magazine. Deutsche Bank is a German institution, but its entry into Bitcoin custody is relevant to US investors because it signals continued institutional infrastructure development in the asset class that Strategy holds. Deutsche Bank has not yet filed a formal announcement with regulators specifying the launch date, fee structure, or jurisdictions of operation; those details would likely appear in regulatory filings or a formal press release when the service launches.

The MSCI methodology change and Deutsche Bank's custody development together reflect two separate pressures acting on institutional Bitcoin adoption in the same week: one regulatory and classificatory, one infrastructural. Whether index exclusion constrains Strategy's buying capacity or whether new custody entrants offset that pressure by attracting different institutional capital are questions whose answers would require post-Nov. 30 market data to evaluate.

Investors seeking to assess the direct impact of the MSCI change on Strategy's stock should monitor the company's 8-K filings with the SEC, any formal MSCI constituent list update published after Nov. 30, and Strategy's next equity or debt offering prospectus, which would disclose current capital costs.

Today's Analysis
Loading...
★
Latest Intelligence
Congressional Intelligence
Loading...
★
Financial Intelligence
Loading...
★
Geopolitical Intelligence
Loading...
★
Follow the MoneyGab-E Political Intelligence Investigation
Loading...
Opinion & Analysis
Loading...
Archive
Loading...
About
Our Mission

We Follow the Data, Not the Narrative

The Congressional Times exists because public records are public — and the analysis built from them should not be exclusive to those who can afford $60,000-a-year intelligence subscriptions.

Every story published in The Congressional Times is sourced to a verifiable public record: a court filing, a Senate lobbying disclosure, an FEC contribution record, a USASpending contract, or a verified news report. We state our sources inline. We show our math. When we are wrong, we say so publicly.

We do not editorialize in news coverage. We do not use loaded language. Both political parties are held to identical standards.

The Follow the Money investigations are the heart of this publication. Each begins with Gab-E Political Intelligence running against 10+ million government records before a single word of editorial is written.

Powered by Gab-E, an elite global intelligence platform built to democratize political and financial intelligence.

Editorial Policy
Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy

How We Source, Verify, and Correct Our Work

Every factual claim in a Congressional Times story is checked against a primary source: a government filing, a court record, a direct quote, before publication. When a claim can't be verified or doesn't hold up as originally reported, we drop it or reframe it. We do not publish disputed claims as settled fact.

When we get it wrong: we correct the story directly, note the correction and date at the bottom of the piece, and update the record. We do not quietly edit and move on.

Bylines: stories with a named byline are written and fact-checked by that person. Stories without a byline are sourced from Gab-E Political Intelligence, our automated research platform, and are labeled as such.

Ownership: The Congressional Times is published by Gab-E Holdings LLC. Gab-E, our intelligence platform, powers our sourcing and research pipeline.

Corrections or concerns: support@gab-e.com